PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CFICX vs. CFWAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFICX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than CFWAX's 3.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CFICX has underperformed CFWAX with an annualized return of 3.01%, while CFWAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return.


CFICX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.64%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.73%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
3.01%

CFWAX

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
3.39%
6M
1.94%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
9.84%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
0.59%8.94%4.11%7.61%-16.07%1.71%8.26%14.75%-3.36%6.57%
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
3.39%14.38%3.91%18.34%-19.63%22.59%14.79%28.02%-13.63%18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CFICX and CFWAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008

-0.00

The correlation between CFICX and CFWAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CFICX vs. CFWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFICX
CFICX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CFICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CFICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFICX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CFWAX
CFWAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CFWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CFWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) and Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CFICXCFWAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.14

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.83

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

2.50

+4.45

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the CFWAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFICX and CFWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CFICXCFWAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.78

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.31

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.39

+0.61

Drawdowns

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFICX drawdown since its inception was -21.28%, smaller than the maximum CFWAX drawdown of -39.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFICX and CFWAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFICXCFWAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-39.67%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-12.79%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-17.64%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.28%

-29.17%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.28%

-36.25%

+14.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-7.71%

+6.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-7.96%

+4.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

4.25%

-3.33%

Volatility

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Income Fund (CFICX) is 1.50%, while Calvert Global Water Fund (CFWAX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that CFICX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFICXCFWAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

4.43%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

10.65%

-7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

13.65%

-9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

15.72%

-10.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.22%

16.94%

-11.72%

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFICX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than CFWAX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

CFICX vs. CFWAX - Dividend Comparison

CFICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than CFWAX's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFICX
Calvert Income Fund
4.74%4.86%4.91%4.05%3.22%2.70%2.96%3.25%3.60%2.96%3.23%2.87%
CFWAX
Calvert Global Water Fund
4.62%4.77%9.25%2.57%1.47%0.93%0.77%0.83%1.30%0.93%0.00%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


CFICX and CFWAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CFWAX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to CFICX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFICX dropped -21.28% vs CFWAX's -39.67%.

CFICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CFICX and CFWAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer