CFA vs. SUSC
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC).
CFA and SUSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFA is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. SUSC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2017. Both CFA and SUSC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CFA vs. SUSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFA vs. SUSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 0.77% | 8.63% | 15.34% | 11.85% | -11.39% | 26.09% | 11.98% | 30.15% | -8.62% | 9.78% |
SUSC iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF | -0.33% | 7.57% | 1.91% | 8.58% | -15.95% | -1.57% | 9.57% | 14.43% | -3.13% | 1.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than SUSC's -0.33% return.
CFA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
SUSC
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 0.39%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFA vs. SUSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSC's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFA vs. SUSC — Risk / Return Rank
CFA
SUSC
CFA vs. SUSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFA | SUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.91 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 1.75 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 5.21 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFA | SUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.91 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.06 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.29 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFA and SUSC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CFA vs. SUSC - Dividend Comparison
CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than SUSC's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.15% | 1.37% | 1.31% |
SUSC iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.43% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 3.33% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CFA vs. SUSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than SUSC's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and SUSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFA | SUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.74% | -22.42% | -15.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -2.87% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.88% | -22.42% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -2.15% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -5.98% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 0.97% | +1.62% |
Volatility
CFA vs. SUSC - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) at 2.20%. This indicates that CFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFA | SUSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 2.20% | +2.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 3.02% | +5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 5.35% | +10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 7.19% | +7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 7.68% | +9.55% |