CFA vs. SAMT
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT).
CFA and SAMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CFA is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap 500 Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. SAMT is an actively managed fund by Strategas. It was launched on Jan 25, 2022.
Performance
CFA vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CFA vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 0.77% | 8.63% | 15.34% | 11.85% | -4.21% |
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF | 1.97% | 33.10% | 28.15% | 1.27% | -6.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CFA achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than SAMT's 1.97% return.
CFA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
SAMT
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- 1Y
- 35.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CFA vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CFA vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank
CFA
SAMT
CFA vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CFA | SAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 2.01 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 2.65 | -1.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.10 | -3.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 11.61 | -7.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CFA | SAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.01 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.76 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CFA and SAMT is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CFA vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison
CFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than SAMT's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFA VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.32% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.15% | 1.37% | 1.31% |
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF | 0.69% | 0.70% | 1.40% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CFA vs. SAMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CFA drawdown since its inception was -37.74%, which is greater than SAMT's maximum drawdown of -20.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFA and SAMT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CFA | SAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.74% | -20.57% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -8.76% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -5.78% | +0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -8.00% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.10% | -0.51% |
Volatility
CFA vs. SAMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Weighted ETF (CFA) is 4.20%, while Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that CFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CFA | SAMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 4.97% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.19% | 11.91% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 17.68% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 16.78% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 16.78% | +0.45% |