CF vs. FHKCX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while FHKCX (Fidelity China Region Fund) is China Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, CF returned 17.90%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for FHKCX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CF vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 42.89% return, which is significantly higher than FHKCX's 33.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has outperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 17.90%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.22% annualized return.

CF

• 1D: 2.74%
• 1M: -12.58%
• YTD: 42.89%
• 6M: 39.56%
• 1Y: 11.91%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: 17.90%

FHKCX

• 1D: 4.07%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 33.90%
• 6M: 36.76%
• 1Y: 71.61%
• 3Y*: 31.30%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: 15.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CF vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc.	42.89%	-7.17%	10.08%	-4.75%	22.29%	87.18%	-15.76%	12.73%	5.13%	40.24%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	33.90%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	47.85%	35.12%	-17.43%	51.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CF and FHKCX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2005	0.28

The correlation between CF and FHKCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CF vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CF

CF Risk / Return Rank: 57
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CF vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CF	FHKCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	3.08	-2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	3.70	-2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.53	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	6.43	-5.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	19.26	-17.91

CF vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CF Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CF and FHKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CF vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, which is greater than FHKCX's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and FHKCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CF	FHKCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.73%	-61.96%	-14.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.87%	-10.80%	-14.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.16%	-22.02%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.36%	-52.42%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.74%	-58.41%	-2.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.11%	-4.29%	-15.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.92%	-20.25%	-4.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.29%	3.60%	+10.69%

Volatility

CF vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) have volatilities of 9.83% and 10.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CF	FHKCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.83%	10.32%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.49%	18.40%	+17.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.20%	22.56%	+19.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.23%	24.47%	+13.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.30%	22.44%	+17.86%

Dividends

CF vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FHKCX's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc.	1.83%	2.59%	2.34%	2.01%	1.76%	1.70%	3.10%	2.51%	2.76%	2.82%	3.81%	2.94%
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.31%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CF and FHKCX in my portfolio?

CF and FHKCX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CF or FHKCX?

FHKCX has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to CF (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CF dropped -76.73% vs FHKCX's -61.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.