PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CF vs. ENEL.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CF is traded in USD, while ENEL.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENEL.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 42.89% return, which is significantly higher than ENEL.MI's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has outperformed ENEL.MI with an annualized return of 17.90%, while ENEL.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 16.16% annualized return.


CF

1D
2.74%
1M
-12.41%
YTD
42.89%
6M
39.56%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
17.90%

ENEL.MI

1D
1.24%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
11.27%
6M
13.39%
1Y
28.98%
3Y*
26.95%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
16.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
42.89%-7.17%10.08%-4.75%22.29%87.18%-15.76%12.73%5.13%40.24%
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
11.27%54.38%2.16%47.14%-27.94%-18.12%33.94%44.24%-1.88%45.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CF and ENEL.MI is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.18

The correlation between CF and ENEL.MI shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CF vs. ENEL.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CF
CF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and Enel SpA (ENEL.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CFENEL.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.31

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

6.46

-5.11

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CF Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CF and ENEL.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, which is greater than ENEL.MI's maximum drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and ENEL.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CFENEL.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.73%

-62.43%

-14.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.87%

-12.54%

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.16%

-16.58%

-12.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.36%

-56.89%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.74%

-60.65%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.11%

-5.96%

-14.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.92%

-20.97%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.29%

4.49%

+9.80%

Volatility

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Volatility Comparison

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) at 5.95%. This indicates that CF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENEL.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CFENEL.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.83%

5.95%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.49%

18.62%

+16.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.20%

21.01%

+21.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.23%

23.88%

+14.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.30%

24.69%

+15.61%

Dividends

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Dividend Comparison

CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than ENEL.MI's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.83%2.59%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
4.95%4.98%5.44%5.56%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%4.70%3.51%3.82%3.60%

Financials

CF vs. ENEL.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and Enel SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CF values in USD, ENEL.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


CF and ENEL.MI have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CF and ENEL.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer