CF vs. AMSC
CF (CF Industries Holdings, Inc.) and AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) are both stocks. CF operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials), while AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CF returned 19.43%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for AMSC. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CF vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CF achieves a 52.60% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 24.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CF has outperformed AMSC with an annualized return of 19.43%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively lower 14.23% annualized return.
CF
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- 9.72%
- 6M
- 42.89%
- YTD
- 52.60%
- 1Y
- 21.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.81%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- 19.43%
AMSC
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 75.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
CF vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 52.60% | -7.17% | 10.08% | -4.75% | 22.29% | 87.18% | -15.76% | 12.73% | 5.13% | 40.24% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 24.95% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CF and AMSC is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2005 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CF and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CF:
$17.96B
AMSC:
$1.74B
CF:
$11.18
AMSC:
$2.95
CF:
10.46
AMSC:
12.17
CF:
0.17
AMSC:
0.02
CF:
2.48
AMSC:
5.44
CF:
2.19
AMSC:
3.03
CF:
$7.41B
AMSC:
$299.15M
CF:
$2.99B
AMSC:
$91.38M
CF:
$2.60B
AMSC:
$19.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CF vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
CF
AMSC
CF vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CF | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | -0.16 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.88 | -0.25 | +2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CF vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CF drawdown since its inception was -76.73%, smaller than the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CF and AMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CF | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.73% | -99.57% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.45% | -61.08% | +35.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.16% | -63.86% | +34.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.36% | -82.94% | +34.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.74% | -89.06% | +28.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.68% | -94.81% | +80.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.91% | -75.80% | +50.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.17% | 38.03% | -24.86% |
Volatility
CF vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) is 8.65%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that CF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CF | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 22.33% | -13.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.68% | 54.94% | -19.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.78% | 85.50% | -43.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.05% | 87.45% | -49.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.12% | 79.28% | -39.16% |
Dividends
CF vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
CF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CF CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 1.71% | 2.59% | 2.34% | 2.01% | 1.76% | 1.70% | 3.10% | 2.51% | 2.76% | 2.82% | 3.81% | 2.94% |
Financials
CF vs. AMSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and American Superconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CF vs. AMSC - Profitability Comparison
CF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 1.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.6%.
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
CF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
CF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 615.00M and revenue of 1.99B, resulting in a net margin of 31.0%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CF and AMSC have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to CF (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CF dropped -76.73% vs AMSC's -99.57%.
CF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CF and AMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer