PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEZ.PR vs. EMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CZK 10,000 investment in Cez A.S. (CEZ.PR) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CEZ.PR is traded in CZK, while EMB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMB values have been converted to CZK using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEZ.PR achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, CEZ.PR has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 19.20%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.92% annualized return.


CEZ.PR

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.25%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
0.63%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
24.01%
10Y*
19.20%

EMB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.84%
YTD
3.22%
6M
2.37%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CEZ.PR
Cez A.S.
-0.62%40.70%5.78%45.23%-2.49%74.83%8.41%-0.34%14.53%24.87%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
3.22%-3.77%14.80%9.77%-16.14%-0.42%-0.10%16.74%-0.39%-8.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CEZ.PR and EMB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2007

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEZ.PR vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEZ.PR
CEZ.PR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CEZ.PR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEZ.PR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEZ.PR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CEZ.PR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEZ.PR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EMB
EMB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cez A.S. (CEZ.PR) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEZ.PREMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.86

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

5.51

-4.04

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEZ.PR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the EMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEZ.PR and EMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEZ.PREMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.94

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.18

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.18

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.39

+0.09

Drawdowns

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEZ.PR drawdown since its inception was -68.97%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEZ.PR and EMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEZ.PREMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.97%

-32.88%

-36.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.29%

-3.60%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-13.55%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

-21.95%

-14.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-23.66%

-12.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-3.66%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.55%

-7.31%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

1.21%

+6.52%

Volatility

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison

Cez A.S. (CEZ.PR) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.18%. This indicates that CEZ.PR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEZ.PREMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

1.18%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.60%

5.05%

+14.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

7.17%

+13.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

10.36%

+14.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

10.69%

+10.98%

Dividends

CEZ.PR vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison

CEZ.PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than EMB's 5.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEZ.PR
Cez A.S.
3.65%3.63%5.43%15.13%6.23%6.29%6.60%4.71%6.17%6.65%9.30%9.00%
EMB
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
5.04%4.98%5.46%4.74%5.04%3.89%3.88%4.51%5.64%4.54%4.83%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


CEZ.PR and EMB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEZ.PR and EMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer