CES1.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CES1.L (iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - CES1.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CES1.L returned 10.11%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CES1.L charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CES1.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CES1.L has underperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 10.11%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return.

CES1.L

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 12.64%
• 1Y: 20.42%
• 3Y*: 13.56%
• 5Y*: 6.70%
• 10Y*: 10.11%

CMU.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 8.13%
• YTD: 15.89%
• 6M: 17.12%
• 1Y: 29.56%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CES1.L iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.08%	30.70%	-4.07%	11.92%	-11.62%	15.21%	11.44%	21.04%	-16.15%	28.53%
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select	15.89%	25.71%	1.42%	14.39%	-5.30%	13.03%	4.59%	19.05%	-11.56%	17.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CES1.L and CMU.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013	0.89

The correlation between CES1.L and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CES1.L	CMU.L
Industrials	28.9%	15.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	10.1%
Technology	10.6%	30.8%
Basic Materials	10.4%	2.8%
Financial Services	9.5%	21.8%
Real Estate	7.2%	1.3%
Energy	5.9%	0.0%
Healthcare	4.5%	4.2%
Communication Services	4.0%	2.3%
Utilities	3.7%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	5.2%

Return for Risk

CES1.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CES1.L

CES1.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
CES1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CES1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
CES1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
CES1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
CES1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CMU.L

CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CES1.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.98	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.79	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	2.58	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	9.67	-3.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CES1.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CES1.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CES1.L	CMU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.98	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.66	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.65	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.49	+0.18

Drawdowns

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CES1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CES1.L and CMU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CES1.L	CMU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.68%	-32.53%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-11.43%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.92%	-11.95%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.02%	-21.11%	-5.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.68%	-31.41%	-1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-0.18%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-5.80%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	3.05%	+0.06%

Volatility

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) is 4.07%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that CES1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CES1.L	CMU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.07%	5.34%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	12.44%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	14.86%	-1.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.10%	16.00%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.01%	16.78%	-0.77%

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CES1.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

CES1.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CES1.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CES1.L and CMU.L in my portfolio?

CES1.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CES1.L or CMU.L?

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CES1.L or CMU.L?

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CES1.L.

What is the main difference between CES1.L and CMU.L?

CES1.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CES1.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.