PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CES1.L vs. XXSC.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CES1.LXXSC.L
YTD Return-3.36%1.42%
1Y Return5.80%13.58%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.81%-3.44%
5Y Return (Ann)4.61%4.52%
10Y Return (Ann)9.01%8.20%
Sharpe Ratio0.531.17
Sortino Ratio0.821.72
Omega Ratio1.101.21
Calmar Ratio0.470.66
Martin Ratio1.305.77
Ulcer Index5.20%2.55%
Daily Std Dev12.71%12.63%
Max Drawdown-32.68%-35.12%
Current Drawdown-9.70%-10.81%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between CES1.L and XXSC.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CES1.L achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than XXSC.L's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CES1.L has outperformed XXSC.L with an annualized return of 9.01%, while XXSC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.25%
1.38%
CES1.L
XXSC.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CES1.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XXSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


CES1.L
iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)
Expense ratio chart for CES1.L: current value at 0.58% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.58%
Expense ratio chart for XXSC.L: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CES1.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CES1.L, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CES1.L, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CES1.L, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CES1.L, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CES1.L, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.80
XXSC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XXSC.L, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XXSC.L, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XXSC.L, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XXSC.L, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XXSC.L, currently valued at 6.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.57

CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CES1.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the XXSC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CES1.L and XXSC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.79
1.32
CES1.L
XXSC.L

Dividends

CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CES1.L nor XXSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CES1.L drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum XXSC.L drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CES1.L and XXSC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-18.00%-16.00%-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.50%
-16.45%
CES1.L
XXSC.L

Volatility

CES1.L vs. XXSC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (CES1.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Small Cap UCITS ETF 1C (XXSC.L) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.63%
2.76%
CES1.L
XXSC.L