PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CERY vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CERY vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
22.00%15.68%3.92%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
10.46%64.20%4.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 22.00% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 10.46% return.


CERY

1D
-1.16%
1M
5.37%
YTD
22.00%
6M
27.31%
1Y
31.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
1.74%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
10.46%
6M
23.17%
1Y
52.61%
3Y*
34.09%
5Y*
22.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CERY vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CERYGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.92

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.35

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.74

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

10.04

+0.84

CERY vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CERYGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.92

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

1.11

+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and GLDM is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CERY vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CERY vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum GLDM drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and GLDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-21.63%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-19.14%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-11.68%

+9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-6.05%

+3.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

5.22%

-2.29%

Volatility

CERY vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) is 6.64%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that CERY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CERYGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

10.44%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

24.12%

-11.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

27.58%

-11.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

17.65%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

16.78%

-2.13%