PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. EVMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CERY vs. EVMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 29.88% return, which is significantly higher than EVMT's 13.45% return.


CERY

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
29.88%
6M
30.50%
1Y
44.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVMT

1D
-1.66%
1M
2.45%
YTD
13.45%
6M
22.53%
1Y
41.86%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CERY vs. EVMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CERY and EVMT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. EVMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EVMT
EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. EVMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CERYEVMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.51

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.38

5.28

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.66

17.86

+2.80

CERY vs. EVMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the EVMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and EVMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CERYEVMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

2.79

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

-0.26

+2.26

Drawdowns

CERY vs. EVMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum EVMT drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and EVMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYEVMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-48.34%

+38.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.98%

-7.96%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-21.69%

+17.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-34.74%

+32.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.35%

-0.20%

Volatility

CERY vs. EVMT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) at 4.51%. This indicates that CERY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CERYEVMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

4.51%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.29%

13.47%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

15.09%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.71%

20.51%

-5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

20.51%

-5.80%

CERY vs. EVMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than EVMT's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CERY vs. EVMT - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than EVMT's 10.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.85%4.99%0.52%0.00%0.00%
EVMT
Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
10.40%11.80%3.62%5.49%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


CERY and EVMT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CERY has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to EVMT (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CERY dropped -10.05% vs EVMT's -48.34%.

On 1-year performance, CERY leads with 44.30% vs 41.86% for EVMT. On fees, CERY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, EVMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CERY has performed better with a 44.30% return vs 41.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CERY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 10.40%, compared with 3.85% for CERY.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CERY and 0.59% for EVMT.

CERY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CERY and EVMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer