PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CERY vs. COMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CERY vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CERY vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CERY achieves a 22.00% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 23.16% return.


CERY

1D
-1.16%
1M
5.37%
YTD
22.00%
6M
27.31%
1Y
31.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COMB

1D
-1.01%
1M
7.93%
YTD
23.16%
6M
29.16%
1Y
30.35%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CERY vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CERY has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CERY vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CERY
CERY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CERY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CERY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

COMB
COMB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CERY vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CERYCOMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.77

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.34

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.30

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

9.08

+1.80

CERY vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CERY Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CERY and COMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CERYCOMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.77

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

0.51

+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between CERY and COMB is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CERY vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

CERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than COMB's 7.35% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CERY
SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
4.09%4.99%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
7.35%9.05%2.48%6.57%30.85%15.83%0.07%1.48%0.97%0.20%

Drawdowns

CERY vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CERY drawdown since its inception was -10.05%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CERY and COMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CERYCOMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-33.50%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-9.19%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.01%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-12.25%

+10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.34%

-0.41%

Volatility

CERY vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY) is 6.64%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that CERY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CERYCOMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

7.63%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

13.86%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

17.20%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

16.54%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.65%

15.05%

-0.40%