CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO
CEQT.TO (CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF) and CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CEQT.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI, while CIAI.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CEQT.TO returned 26.14% vs 31.56% for CIAI.TO. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CEQT.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CIAI.TO.
Performance
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEQT.TO achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than CIAI.TO's 19.72% return.
CEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 26.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.74%
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$4.87K | CA$10.66K | CA$16.79K | |
| CA$1.13M | CA$1.20M | CA$2.71M |
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 13.51% | 18.84% | 18.26% |
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.72% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEQT.TO and CIAI.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CEQT.TO
CIAI.TO
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEQT.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.18 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 1.44 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.11 | 3.79 | +10.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum CIAI.TO drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQT.TO and CIAI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEQT.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -31.22% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -18.93% | +11.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -9.81% | +8.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -6.50% | +5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 7.20% | -5.34% |
Volatility
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) is 1.60%, while CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that CEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIAI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEQT.TO | CIAI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 10.77% | -9.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 23.36% | -14.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 28.32% | -17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 29.48% | -16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 29.48% | -16.55% |
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEQT.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CIAI.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEQT.TO vs. CIAI.TO - Dividend Comparison
CEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 1.09% | 1.25% | 1.82% | 1.06% |
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEQT.TO and CIAI.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
CEQT.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CIAI.TO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CEQT.TO and 0.50% for CIAI.TO.
Find the right allocation for CEQT.TO and CIAI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer