CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO).

CEQT.TO and CSBG.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on May 17, 2023. CSBG.NEO is an actively managed fund by CIBC. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021.

Performance

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	-1.84%	18.84%	27.38%	6.47%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.17%	1.22%

Returns By Period

CEQT.TO

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -6.66%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSBG.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: 0.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEQT.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CSBG.NEO's 0.90% expense ratio.

CSBG.NEO

CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF

CEQT.TO

CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEQT.TO

CEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
CEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
CEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) and CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEQT.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEQT.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	1.10	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between CEQT.TO and CSBG.NEO is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while CSBG.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CEQT.TO CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF	1.04%	1.25%	1.82%	1.06%	0.00%
CSBG.NEO CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.16%	1.21%	1.66%

Drawdowns

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, which is greater than CSBG.NEO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEQT.TO and CSBG.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEQT.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.02%	0.00%	-14.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.49%	0.00%	-11.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	0.00%	-7.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.20%	0.00%	-1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	0.00%	+2.90%

Volatility

CEQT.TO vs. CSBG.NEO - Volatility Comparison

CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to CIBC Sustainable Balanced Growth Solution ETF (CSBG.NEO) at 0.00%. This indicates that CEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSBG.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEQT.TO	CSBG.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	0.00%	+3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	0.00%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.53%	0.00%	+16.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.94%	1.30%	+11.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.94%	1.30%	+11.64%