PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEPI vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEPI vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEPI achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.


CEPI

1D
-1.35%
1M
7.21%
YTD
20.71%
6M
18.40%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.79%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEPI vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CEPI and RBIL is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEPI vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEPI
CEPI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CEPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CEPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEPI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEPI vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CEPIRBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

2.39

-1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

17.00

-15.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

70.66

-67.04

CEPI vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEPI and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEPIRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

5.01

-3.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

4.28

-3.83

Drawdowns

CEPI vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEPI drawdown since its inception was -29.48%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEPI and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEPIRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.48%

-0.50%

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.47%

-0.27%

-22.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

0.00%

-2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-0.06%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.43%

0.07%

+9.36%

Volatility

CEPI vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF (CEPI) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that CEPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEPIRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

0.30%

+5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

0.79%

+20.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.79%

0.92%

+25.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.57%

1.05%

+30.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.57%

1.05%

+30.52%

CEPI vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEPI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CEPI vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

CEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.71%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CEPI and RBIL have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CEPI has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEPI dropped -29.48% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, CEPI leads with 34.07% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CEPI has performed better with a 34.07% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CEPI.

CEPI has the higher dividend yield at 42.71%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.

CEPI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CEPI and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEPI and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer