CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE
CEMT.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CEMT.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEMT.DE returned 6.44%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMT.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, CEMT.DE has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 6.44%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.
CEMT.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.44%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 46.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMT.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 17.53% | 5.08% | 14.19% | -18.24% | 19.63% | 1.61% | 28.81% | -13.99% | 13.62% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMT.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CEMT.DE and IS3N.DE has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMT.DE
IS3N.DE
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.49 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 4.42 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 16.00 | -11.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 2.69 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.53 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMT.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.66%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMT.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.66% | -35.06% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.26% | -10.52% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.36% | -19.17% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -22.01% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.66% | -32.51% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.49% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.08% | -9.30% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 2.91% | -1.75% |
Volatility
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (CEMT.DE) is 0.00%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that CEMT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEMT.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 7.16% | -7.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.00% | 14.69% | -14.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 17.32% | -11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 16.19% | -1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 18.04% | -1.93% |
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMT.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEMT.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMT.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEMT.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMT.DE.
CEMT.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. CEMT.DE tracks MSCI Europe Mid Cap Equal Weighted, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CEMT.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEMT.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer