CEMIX vs. LZIEX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CEMIX (Causeway Emerging Markets Fund) and LZIEX (Lazard International Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - CEMIX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Causeway, while LZIEX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Lazard. Over the past 10 years, CEMIX returned 10.58%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for LZIEX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEMIX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for LZIEX.

Performance

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMIX achieves a 24.50% return, which is significantly higher than LZIEX's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CEMIX has outperformed LZIEX with an annualized return of 10.58%, while LZIEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.19% annualized return.

CEMIX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -7.41%
• 6M: 17.43%
• YTD: 24.50%
• 1Y: 42.93%
• 3Y*: 26.00%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: 10.58%

LZIEX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -1.40%
• 6M: 5.08%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 1Y: 21.36%
• 3Y*: 15.94%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: 8.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	24.50%	36.22%	14.90%	17.13%	-23.05%	-0.83%	16.95%	16.73%	-17.91%	39.79%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	9.12%	34.14%	5.30%	16.49%	-15.00%	6.14%	8.76%	21.20%	-13.71%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CEMIX and LZIEX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007	0.73

The correlation between CEMIX and LZIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CEMIX vs. LZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMIX

CEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
CEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
CEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

LZIEX

LZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 36
LZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
LZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
LZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
LZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) and Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CEMIX	LZIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.38	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	1.94	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	1.71	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.14	5.86	+5.28

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the LZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEMIX and LZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMIX drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, which is greater than LZIEX's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMIX and LZIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEMIX	LZIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.90%	-55.35%	-13.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.61%	-11.88%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.92%	-13.71%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.37%	-30.42%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.59%	-35.12%	-4.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.19%	-2.01%	-7.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-11.20%	-4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.00%	3.46%	+0.54%

Volatility

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Causeway Emerging Markets Fund (CEMIX) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Lazard International Equity Portfolio (LZIEX) at 4.01%. This indicates that CEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEMIX	LZIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.23%	4.01%	+7.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.60%	12.47%	+10.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.72%	14.75%	+9.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.84%	15.89%	+2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	15.89%	+2.95%

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than LZIEX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEMIX vs. LZIEX - Dividend Comparison

CEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than LZIEX's 11.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEMIX Causeway Emerging Markets Fund	2.00%	2.49%	3.73%	4.85%	4.87%	23.35%	1.36%	2.03%	2.01%	1.58%	1.55%	1.69%
LZIEX Lazard International Equity Portfolio	11.32%	12.35%	8.26%	3.78%	6.12%	17.81%	1.03%	2.07%	7.93%	1.42%	1.06%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEMIX and LZIEX in my portfolio?

CEMIX and LZIEX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEMIX or LZIEX?

CEMIX has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to LZIEX (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEMIX dropped -68.90% vs LZIEX's -55.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.