CEMB vs. RDFI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI).
CEMB and RDFI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. It was launched on Apr 17, 2012. RDFI is an actively managed fund by Rareview Funds. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020.
Performance
CEMB vs. RDFI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMB vs. RDFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | -0.47% | 8.86% | 5.81% | 8.37% | -12.58% | -0.59% | 4.10% |
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | -1.63% | 9.83% | 13.15% | 8.57% | -17.06% | 12.51% | 8.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMB achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than RDFI's -1.63% return.
CEMB
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
RDFI
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMB vs. RDFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RDFI's 3.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEMB vs. RDFI — Risk / Return Rank
CEMB
RDFI
CEMB vs. RDFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) and Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 0.67 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 0.92 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 0.74 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 3.00 | +4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.67 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.71 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMB and RDFI is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEMB vs. RDFI - Dividend Comparison
CEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than RDFI's 8.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.17% | 5.14% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% |
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 8.39% | 8.17% | 8.14% | 7.38% | 4.70% | 6.78% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEMB vs. RDFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMB drawdown since its inception was -20.84%, smaller than the maximum RDFI drawdown of -23.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMB and RDFI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.84% | -23.71% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -8.01% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -23.71% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -6.02% | +3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -7.34% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 1.96% | -1.20% |
Volatility
CEMB vs. RDFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) is 1.56%, while Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that CEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMB | RDFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 4.47% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 5.70% | -3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.24% | 8.40% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 8.06% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 7.96% | -1.56% |