CELT vs. TSLG
CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
CELT vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CELT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLG
- 1D
- -11.63%
- 1M
- -22.10%
- YTD
- -37.23%
- 6M
- -46.41%
- 1Y
- -12.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CELT vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | -19.49% | -55.03% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -37.23% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELT and TSLG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELT vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
CELT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLG
CELT vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CELT | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELT vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELT | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -82.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -68.29% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -58.78% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.68% | — |
Volatility
CELT vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELT | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 89.25% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 115.05% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 115.05% | — |
CELT vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CELT vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
CELT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 10.43% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CELT and TSLG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.43%, compared with 0.00% for CELT.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for TSLG.
Find the right allocation for CELT and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer