CELT vs. NEMG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.

Performance

CELT vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NEMG

• 1D: -7.98%
• 1M: -20.02%
• YTD: -20.44%
• 6M: -28.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	9.67%
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF	-20.44%	22.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and NEMG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.10

Return for Risk

CELT vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	NEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-57.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-53.44%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	NEMG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	102.63%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	102.63%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	102.63%	—

CELT vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor NEMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and NEMG in my portfolio?

CELT and NEMG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or NEMG?

On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or NEMG?

NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or NEMG?

CELT and NEMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CELT and NEMG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for NEMG.