CELT vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

CELT vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	-56.51%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	82.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and MULL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

CELT vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CELT vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CELT	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	46.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	7.45	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-72.29%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.62%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.79%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	55.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	105.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	132.38%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	136.22%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	136.22%	—

CELT vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

CELT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and MULL in my portfolio?

CELT and MULL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or MULL?

On fees, CELT is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or MULL?

CELT is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for CELT.

What is the main difference between CELT and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 1.50% for MULL.