CELT vs. IREG
CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IREG.
Performance
CELT vs. IREG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CELT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IREG
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 56.03%
- YTD
- 76.42%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CELT vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF | -19.49% | 10.80% |
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 76.42% | 3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELT and IREG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELT vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CELT | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.33 | — |
Drawdowns
CELT vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELT | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -80.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -29.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -44.09% | — |
Volatility
CELT vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELT | IREG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 208.00% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 208.00% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 208.00% | — |
CELT vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CELT vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CELT nor IREG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CELT and IREG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.
CELT and IREG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for IREG.
Find the right allocation for CELT and IREG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer