CELT vs. ABNG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) and ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CELT charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ABNG.

Performance

CELT vs. ABNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABNG

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -9.63%
• YTD: -12.01%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CELT vs. ABNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	24.44%
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF	-12.01%	30.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CELT and ABNG is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.00

Return for Risk

CELT vs. ABNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT) and Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CELT	ABNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.47	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CELT	ABNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-33.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-17.07%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CELT	ABNG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	62.89%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	62.89%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	62.89%	—

CELT vs. ABNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CELT has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CELT vs. ABNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CELT nor ABNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CELT and ABNG in my portfolio?

CELT and ABNG have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CELT or ABNG?

On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CELT or ABNG?

ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CELT or ABNG?

CELT and ABNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CELT and ABNG?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CELT and 0.75% for ABNG.