CELH vs. STIP
CELH (Celsius Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L). Over the past 10 years, CELH returned 43.02%/yr vs 3.08%/yr for STIP. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CELH vs. STIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -37.65% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed STIP with an annualized return of 43.02%, while STIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.08% annualized return.
CELH
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -37.65%
- 6M
- -36.23%
- 1Y
- -37.19%
- 3Y*
- -17.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 43.02%
STIP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 3.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
CELH vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | -37.65% | 73.65% | -51.69% | 57.21% | 39.52% | 48.22% | 941.61% | 39.19% | -33.90% | 114.29% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.39% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.68% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 0.54% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELH and STIP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELH vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank
CELH
STIP
CELH vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CELH | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.50 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | 5.05 | -5.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 18.15 | -19.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELH vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -77.86%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and STIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELH | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.86% | -5.50% | -72.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.22% | -0.73% | -56.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.86% | -0.95% | -76.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.86% | -5.50% | -72.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.86% | -5.50% | -72.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.33% | -0.67% | -69.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -0.99% | -27.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.52% | 0.20% | +31.32% |
Volatility
CELH vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison
Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 16.72% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.65%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELH | STIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.72% | 0.65% | +16.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.40% | 1.14% | +36.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.60% | 1.53% | +55.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.35% | 2.74% | +62.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.97% | 2.45% | +66.52% |
Dividends
CELH vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison
CELH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.33% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CELH and STIP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CELH has higher volatility (16.72%) compared to STIP (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELH dropped -77.86% vs STIP's -5.50%.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELH and STIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer