CELH vs. PEP

In the year-to-date period, CELH achieves a -52.93% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's -4.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CELH has outperformed PEP with an annualized return of 65.06%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CELH Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CELH and PEP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CELH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.

The maximum CELH drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, which is greater than PEP's maximum drawdown of -40.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELH and PEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) has a higher volatility of 14.30% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 4.86%. This indicates that CELH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celsius Holdings, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.