PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEGX vs. QQQP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CEGX vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEGX achieves a -51.98% return, which is significantly lower than QQQP's 34.57% return.


CEGX

1D
-2.04%
1M
-34.04%
YTD
-51.98%
6M
-57.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQP

1D
-0.80%
1M
14.67%
YTD
34.57%
6M
30.71%
1Y
72.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEGX vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CEGX
Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF
-51.98%6.48%
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
34.57%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CEGX and QQQP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CEGX vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEGX

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEGX vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEGX vs. QQQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEGXQQQPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

1.12

-1.68

Drawdowns

CEGX vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEGX drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGX and QQQP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CEGXQQQPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.35%

-42.50%

-23.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.48%

-1.29%

-64.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.35%

-7.32%

-26.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

Volatility

CEGX vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CEGXQQQPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.39%

32.06%

+63.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.39%

43.76%

+51.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.39%

43.76%

+51.63%

CEGX vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CEGX and QQQP have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

CEGX vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CEGX nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CEGX and QQQP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CEGX and QQQP have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

CEGX and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CEGX and QQQP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer