CEGX vs. QUBX
CEGX (Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF) and QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Over the past year, CEGX returned -52.76% vs -93.87% for QUBX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
CEGX vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEGX achieves a -55.63% return, which is significantly higher than QUBX's -66.76% return.
CEGX
- 1D
- 4.74%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- -50.24%
- YTD
- -55.63%
- 1Y
- -52.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUBX
- 1D
- -14.37%
- 1M
- -40.56%
- 6M
- -75.55%
- YTD
- -66.76%
- 1Y
- -93.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEGX vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEGX Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF | -55.63% | 13.33% |
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | -66.76% | -84.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEGX and QUBX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEGX vs. QUBX — Risk / Return Rank
CEGX
QUBX
CEGX vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEGX | QUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.93 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.97 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.21 | -0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEGX vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEGX drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, smaller than the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGX and QUBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEGX | QUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.88% | -96.40% | +23.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.88% | -96.40% | +23.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.10% | -95.96% | +27.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.66% | -71.85% | +35.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.69% | 77.47% | -34.78% |
Volatility
CEGX vs. QUBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long CEG Daily ETF (CEGX) is 22.46%, while Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a volatility of 52.89%. This indicates that CEGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEGX | QUBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.46% | 52.89% | -30.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.07% | 133.18% | -61.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 93.80% | 200.09% | -106.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 93.84% | 199.02% | -105.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.84% | 199.02% | -105.18% |
CEGX vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEGX and QUBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
CEGX vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEGX nor QUBX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEGX and QUBX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QUBX has higher volatility (52.89%) compared to CEGX (22.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEGX dropped -72.88% vs QUBX's -96.40%.
On 1-year performance, CEGX leads with -52.76% vs -93.87% for QUBX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, CEGX has been the lower-risk option at 22.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CEGX has performed better with a -52.76% return vs -93.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CEGX and QUBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
CEGX and QUBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
QUBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEGX and QUBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer