CEGI.L vs. BABI.L
CEGI.L (REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing) and BABI.L (IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CEGI.L returned 36.17% vs -24.89% for BABI.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEGI.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BABI.L.
Performance
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEGI.L achieves a 21.78% return, which is significantly higher than BABI.L's -28.38% return.
CEGI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- 6M
- 11.56%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 1Y
- 36.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- 6M
- -35.35%
- YTD
- -28.38%
- 1Y
- -24.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 21.78% | 15.60% |
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | -28.38% | 10,934.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEGI.L and BABI.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L — Risk / Return Rank
CEGI.L
BABI.L
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) and IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEGI.L | BABI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.94 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.42 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | -0.71 | +3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEGI.L drawdown since its inception was -27.98%, smaller than the maximum BABI.L drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEGI.L and BABI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEGI.L | BABI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.98% | -59.96% | +31.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.98% | -59.96% | +31.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -54.55% | +45.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -28.76% | +19.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 34.92% | -22.22% |
Volatility
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L) is 9.85%, while IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) has a volatility of 11.84%. This indicates that CEGI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEGI.L | BABI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 11.84% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.58% | 26.24% | -0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.16% | 55.55% | -20.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.79% | 9,398.92% | -9,364.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.79% | 9,398.92% | -9,364.13% |
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEGI.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BABI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEGI.L vs. BABI.L - Dividend Comparison
CEGI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.49%, less than BABI.L's 65.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | 65.17% | 6.93% |
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 18.49% | 9.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEGI.L and BABI.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BABI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CEGI.L.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CEGI.L and 0.55% for BABI.L.
Find the right allocation for CEGI.L and BABI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer