CEG vs. KGC
CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities), while KGC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, CEG returned 40.06%/yr vs 76.13%/yr for KGC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CEG vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEG achieves a -27.96% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's -8.92% return.
CEG
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -7.54%
- YTD
- -27.96%
- 6M
- -27.70%
- 1Y
- -15.08%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KGC
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -18.08%
- YTD
- -8.92%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 65.63%
- 3Y*
- 76.13%
- 5Y*
- 29.09%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
CEG vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -27.96% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -8.92% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -23.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEG and KGC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
CEG:
$89.83B
KGC:
$30.80B
CEG:
$8.13
KGC:
$2.35
CEG:
31.23
KGC:
10.87
CEG:
0.54
KGC:
0.14
CEG:
3.31
KGC:
3.92
CEG:
2.68
KGC:
3.37
CEG:
$24.82B
KGC:
$7.94B
CEG:
$20.98B
KGC:
$4.19B
CEG:
$5.87B
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEG vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
CEG
KGC
CEG vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEG | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.24 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 1.75 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 5.20 | -5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEG vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEG drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEG | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -96.00% | +45.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.77% | -37.69% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.70% | -37.69% | -13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.93% | -32.63% | -4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -57.60% | +45.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.38% | 12.66% | +6.72% |
Volatility
CEG vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) is 15.26%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 18.21%. This indicates that CEG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEG | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 18.21% | -2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.72% | 40.59% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.66% | 51.35% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 44.22% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 47.01% | +2.37% |
Dividends
CEG vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than KGC's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.64% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.57% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
Financials
CEG vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Energy Corp and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CEG vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEG and KGC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KGC has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to CEG (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEG dropped -50.70% vs KGC's -96.00%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CEG and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer