CEFZ vs. ESBG
CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) and ESBG (First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CEFZ charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ESBG.
Performance
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEFZ achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly higher than ESBG's -3.08% return.
CEFZ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESBG
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- 6M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 6.00% | 3.06% |
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | -3.08% | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEFZ and ESBG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ) and First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF (ESBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEFZ drawdown since its inception was -6.66%, smaller than the maximum ESBG drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEFZ and ESBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEFZ | ESBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -18.84% | +12.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -17.81% | +17.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -7.91% | +6.72% |
Volatility
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEFZ | ESBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 25.60% | -15.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.32% | 25.60% | -15.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.32% | 25.60% | -15.28% |
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEFZ has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ESBG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEFZ vs. ESBG - Dividend Comparison
CEFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than ESBG's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 9.10% | 4.17% |
ESBG First Trust Enhanced Stocks, Bonds & Gold ETF | 1.12% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CEFZ and ESBG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESBG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESBG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.
CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.10%, compared with 1.12% for ESBG.
They also come from different issuers: RiverNorth and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for CEFZ and 0.95% for ESBG.
Find the right allocation for CEFZ and ESBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer