CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE
CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) and SXR1.DE (iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while SXR1.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE returned 11.42%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for SXR1.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBL.DE achieves a 33.53% return, which is significantly higher than SXR1.DE's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBL.DE has outperformed SXR1.DE with an annualized return of 11.42%, while SXR1.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 33.53%
- 6M
- 36.13%
- 1Y
- 53.09%
- 3Y*
- 24.26%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
SXR1.DE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 33.53% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
SXR1.DE iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) | 9.00% | 7.00% | 11.91% | 2.20% | -0.86% | 13.17% | -2.98% | 21.74% | -6.20% | 10.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBL.DE
SXR1.DE
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEBL.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.62 | 2.46 | +2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | 7.14 | +8.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBL.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.09%, smaller than the maximum SXR1.DE drawdown of -38.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBL.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.09% | -38.62% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -6.21% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.53% | -20.28% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -20.28% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -36.91% | +3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -2.08% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.17% | -9.84% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 2.14% | +1.20% |
Volatility
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.81% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) at 3.79%. This indicates that CEBL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXR1.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBL.DE | SXR1.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.81% | 3.79% | +6.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 9.39% | +9.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 11.91% | +9.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 14.78% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 16.55% | +2.55% |
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CEBL.DE vs. SXR1.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBL.DE nor SXR1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while SXR1.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan.
Find the right allocation for CEBL.DE and SXR1.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer