PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR1.DE
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc)
7.01%7.00%11.91%2.20%-0.86%13.17%-2.98%21.74%-6.20%10.76%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
4.32%35.97%9.93%13.90%-4.54%26.62%-8.86%23.48%-14.04%10.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR1.DE achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than CEMS.DE's 4.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR1.DE has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 7.71%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.24% annualized return.


SXR1.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
7.01%
6M
7.00%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.71%

CEMS.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
4.32%
6M
14.46%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
13.64%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR1.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR1.DE
SXR1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR1.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.74

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

2.19

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.26

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.60

12.44

-1.84

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR1.DE and CEMS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR1.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.74

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.89

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.58

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.45

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between SXR1.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR1.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR1.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR1.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR1.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-40.20%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-11.05%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

-19.55%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.91%

-40.20%

+3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-5.11%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-7.58%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.61%

-0.60%

Volatility

SXR1.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXR1.DE) is 4.83%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that SXR1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SXR1.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

6.10%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

9.93%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

16.23%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

15.12%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

17.44%

-0.80%