CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE
CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG while XCS6.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEBG.DE returned 6.90%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for XCS6.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XCS6.DE.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than XCS6.DE's -7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CEBG.DE has outperformed XCS6.DE with an annualized return of 6.90%, while XCS6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 26.86% | -10.03% | 15.73% | -10.56% | -0.89% |
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.24% | 16.38% | 27.05% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.27% | 15.11% | 26.93% | -16.14% | 35.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and XCS6.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2011 | 0.46 |
The correlation between CEBG.DE and XCS6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
XCS6.DE
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.04 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.13 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 0.27 | +10.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.12 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | -0.17 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.17 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.16 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, smaller than the maximum XCS6.DE drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and XCS6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -56.31% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -17.28% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | -24.77% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -49.94% | +19.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | -56.31% | +6.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -33.60% | +29.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -21.19% | +6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 8.27% | -5.29% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) at 7.17%. This indicates that CEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCS6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | XCS6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 7.17% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 13.14% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 18.53% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 27.67% | -6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 25.33% | -1.15% |
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS6.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. XCS6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.DE nor XCS6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBG.DE and XCS6.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBG.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBG.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEBG.DE and 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBG.DE and XCS6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer