CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE
CEBG.DE (VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CEBG.DE tracks the MarketGrader New China ESG while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CEBG.DE returned 13.92%/yr vs -3.95%/yr for FLXC.DE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEBG.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBG.DE achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
CEBG.DE
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A | 11.81% | 38.75% | -22.52% | 33.05% | 5.85% | 26.86% | -10.03% | 8.01% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -15.77% | -15.90% | -14.60% | 16.83% | 19.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBG.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2019 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBG.DE
FLXC.DE
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBG.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.06 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 0.31 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 0.64 | +10.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBG.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 0.27 | +1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | -0.15 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.09 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBG.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBG.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBG.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.49% | -55.61% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -15.19% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.41% | -24.70% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -49.07% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -30.89% | +26.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.04% | -27.95% | +12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 7.38% | -4.40% |
Volatility
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) at 6.78%. This indicates that CEBG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEBG.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 6.78% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 12.35% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 17.78% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 26.71% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 26.20% | -2.02% |
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBG.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CEBG.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBG.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEBG.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CEBG.DE.
CEBG.DE tracks MarketGrader New China ESG, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CEBG.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CEBG.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer