CDUAF vs. SWK
CDUAF (Canadian Utilities Limited) and SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) are both stocks. CDUAF operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CDUAF returned 7.88%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SWK. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CDUAF vs. SWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CDUAF having a 31.32% return and SWK slightly lower at 30.12%. Over the past 10 years, CDUAF has outperformed SWK with an annualized return of 7.88%, while SWK has yielded a comparatively lower 0.18% annualized return.
CDUAF
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 26.63%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 1Y
- 51.07%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.30%
SWK
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 30.12%
- 1Y
- 46.18%
- 3Y*
- 0.86%
- 5Y*
- -10.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.27M | $2.89M | $1.49M | |
| $217.53M | $159.95M | $146.32M |
CDUAF vs. SWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 31.32% | 35.10% | 6.34% | -6.25% | -1.87% | 25.16% | -14.69% | 37.49% | -19.67% | 15.55% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 30.12% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDUAF and SWK is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CDUAF and SWK shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.14 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CDUAF:
$8.23B
SWK:
$14.28B
CDUAF:
CA$0.35
SWK:
$5.44
CDUAF:
158.91
SWK:
17.39
CDUAF:
4.32
SWK:
0.71
CDUAF:
CA$3.54B
SWK:
$15.25B
CDUAF:
CA$1.15B
SWK:
$4.84B
CDUAF:
CA$1.78B
SWK:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDUAF vs. SWK — Risk / Return Rank
CDUAF
SWK
CDUAF vs. SWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDUAF | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.22 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.60 | 1.78 | +7.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.94 | 3.95 | +19.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDUAF vs. SWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDUAF drawdown since its inception was -71.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SWK drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDUAF and SWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDUAF | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.22% | -71.31% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -26.14% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.56% | -48.31% | +34.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -68.79% | +36.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.92% | -71.31% | +29.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.04% | -48.55% | +39.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -19.56% | -20.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 11.73% | -9.59% |
Volatility
CDUAF vs. SWK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) is 5.29%, while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that CDUAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDUAF | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 10.42% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.42% | 28.86% | -16.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 38.42% | -21.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 38.16% | -19.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 36.85% | -12.69% |
Dividends
CDUAF vs. SWK - Dividend Comparison
CDUAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than SWK's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 3.34% | 4.21% | 5.47% | 6.05% | 5.03% | 4.85% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 4.49% | 4.82% | 4.82% | 5.11% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.51% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
CDUAF vs. SWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Utilities Limited and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CDUAF vs. SWK - Profitability Comparison
CDUAF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 346.15M and revenue of 914.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 3.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.
CDUAF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 271.12M and revenue of 914.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.70M and revenue of 3.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
CDUAF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 128.06M and revenue of 914.40M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 351.30M and revenue of 3.96B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDUAF and SWK have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to CDUAF (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDUAF dropped -71.22% vs SWK's -71.31%.
CDUAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDUAF and SWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer