CDUAF vs. LEG
CDUAF (Canadian Utilities Limited) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. CDUAF operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CDUAF returned 7.46%/yr vs -11.06%/yr for LEG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDUAF vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDUAF achieves a 21.00% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -3.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CDUAF has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 7.46%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.06% annualized return.
CDUAF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.13%
- YTD
- 21.00%
- 6M
- 24.57%
- 1Y
- 38.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 15.59%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
CDUAF vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 21.00% | 35.10% | 6.34% | -6.25% | -1.87% | 25.16% | -14.69% | 37.49% | -19.67% | 15.55% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDUAF and LEG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2007 | 0.12 |
The correlation between CDUAF and LEG shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CDUAF:
$10.05B
LEG:
$1.49B
CDUAF:
CA$0.29
LEG:
$1.60
CDUAF:
177.34
LEG:
6.62
CDUAF:
4.05
LEG:
0.49
CDUAF:
2.81
LEG:
1.44
CDUAF:
CA$3.46B
LEG:
$3.03B
CDUAF:
CA$1.39B
LEG:
$717.40M
CDUAF:
CA$1.76B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDUAF vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
CDUAF
LEG
CDUAF vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDUAF | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.09 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.16 | 0.44 | +6.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.76 | 0.90 | +16.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDUAF vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDUAF drawdown since its inception was -71.22%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDUAF and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDUAF | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.22% | -86.41% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.35% | -28.51% | +23.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -77.26% | +56.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.94% | -84.96% | +53.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.92% | -86.41% | +44.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.18% | -77.60% | +61.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.86% | -19.65% | -20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 13.77% | -11.62% |
Volatility
CDUAF vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) is 6.26%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that CDUAF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDUAF | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 11.98% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 31.40% | -19.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.06% | 49.76% | -33.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 42.50% | -23.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.58% | 39.81% | -14.23% |
Dividends
CDUAF vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
CDUAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than LEG's 1.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDUAF Canadian Utilities Limited | 3.62% | 4.21% | 5.47% | 6.05% | 5.03% | 4.85% | 5.32% | 4.24% | 4.49% | 4.82% | 4.82% | 5.11% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.42% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
CDUAF vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Utilities Limited and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CDUAF and LEG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to CDUAF (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDUAF dropped -71.22% vs LEG's -86.41%.
CDUAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDUAF and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer