PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDNS vs. TD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CDNS is traded in USD, while TD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the TD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly lower than TD.TO's 26.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed TD.TO with an annualized return of 31.77%, while TD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.09% annualized return.


CDNS

1D
0.32%
1M
8.58%
YTD
23.16%
6M
19.10%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
24.39%
10Y*
31.77%

TD.TO

1D
0.81%
1M
9.89%
YTD
26.16%
6M
30.50%
1Y
72.48%
3Y*
31.02%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
23.16%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%
TD.TO
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
26.16%85.53%-13.39%4.83%-11.62%40.22%6.24%16.46%-11.97%23.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CDNS and TD.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006

0.29

The correlation between CDNS and TD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CDNS:

$105.37B

TD.TO:

CA$273.16B

EPS

CDNS:

$4.28

TD.TO:

CA$8.81

PE Ratio

CDNS:

89.86

TD.TO:

18.62

PEG Ratio

CDNS:

6.85

TD.TO:

0.67

PS Ratio

CDNS:

19.03

TD.TO:

2.47

PB Ratio

CDNS:

12.08

TD.TO:

2.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

CDNS:

$5.53B

TD.TO:

CA$112.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CDNS:

$4.91B

TD.TO:

CA$59.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

CDNS:

$1.87B

TD.TO:

CA$19.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDNS vs. TD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TD.TO
TD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDNSTD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.79

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

9.96

-9.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.84

39.77

-37.93

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the TD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDNS and TD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than TD.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and TD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDNSTD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.13%

-62.28%

-30.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.85%

-7.31%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.05%

-19.57%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.59%

-31.55%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

-41.46%

+9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

0.00%

-7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.62%

-10.66%

-28.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.63%

1.83%

+11.80%

Volatility

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD.TO) at 5.09%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDNSTD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.52%

5.09%

+11.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.73%

11.97%

+19.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.94%

15.54%

+23.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.17%

18.38%

+17.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.12%

20.44%

+13.68%

Dividends

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Dividend Comparison

CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TD.TO
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
2.60%3.25%5.33%4.48%4.06%3.26%4.32%3.97%3.85%3.19%3.26%3.69%

Financials

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and The Toronto-Dominion Bank. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
1.47B
27.03B
(CDNS) Total Revenue
(TD.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CDNS values in USD, TD.TO values in CAD

CDNS vs. TD.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and The Toronto-Dominion Bank over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
95.9%
55.2%
Portfolio components
CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

TD.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Toronto-Dominion Bank reported a gross profit of 14.91B and revenue of 27.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

TD.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Toronto-Dominion Bank reported an operating income of 5.03B and revenue of 27.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.

TD.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Toronto-Dominion Bank reported a net income of 4.25B and revenue of 27.03B, resulting in a net margin of 15.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CDNS and TD.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDNS and TD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer