CDNS vs. IBDV
CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while IBDV (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg December 2030 Maturity Corporate Index. Over the past 5 years, CDNS returned 24.39%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for IBDV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDNS vs. IBDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly higher than IBDV's 0.41% return.
CDNS
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 10.86%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 28.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 24.39%
- 10Y*
- 31.77%
IBDV
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
CDNS vs. IBDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 23.16% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 48.31% |
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 0.41% | 8.19% | 3.42% | 8.51% | -14.67% | -2.64% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNS and IBDV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNS vs. IBDV — Risk / Return Rank
CDNS
IBDV
CDNS vs. IBDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDNS | IBDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.29 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.21 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 7.41 | -5.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDNS vs. IBDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than IBDV's maximum drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and IBDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNS | IBDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.13% | -21.85% | -71.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.85% | -2.07% | -26.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -5.64% | -23.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -21.54% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -0.81% | -6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -7.19% | -32.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.63% | 0.62% | +13.01% |
Volatility
CDNS vs. IBDV - Volatility Comparison
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF (IBDV) at 0.93%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDNS | IBDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 0.93% | +15.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.73% | 2.04% | +29.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.94% | 2.87% | +36.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 6.44% | +29.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.12% | 6.25% | +27.87% |
Dividends
CDNS vs. IBDV - Dividend Comparison
CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBDV iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Corporate ETF | 4.59% | 4.57% | 4.69% | 4.09% | 3.02% | 1.99% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDNS and IBDV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDNS has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to IBDV (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDNS dropped -93.13% vs IBDV's -21.85%.
IBDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDNS and IBDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer