CDNS vs. GLD
CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Over the past 10 years, CDNS returned 31.77%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CDNS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDNS achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CDNS has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 31.77%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.
CDNS
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 8.58%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 6M
- 19.10%
- 1Y
- 25.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 24.39%
- 10Y*
- 31.77%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
CDNS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 23.16% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDNS and GLD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDNS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
CDNS
GLD
CDNS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDNS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 0.98 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 2.81 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDNS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDNS drawdown since its inception was -93.13%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDNS and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDNS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.13% | -45.56% | -47.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.85% | -24.46% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.05% | -24.46% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.59% | -24.46% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.12% | -24.46% | -7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -22.05% | +14.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -16.16% | -23.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.63% | 8.49% | +5.14% |
Volatility
CDNS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 7.79%. This indicates that CDNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDNS | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 7.79% | +8.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.73% | 24.10% | +7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.94% | 27.37% | +11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 18.22% | +17.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.12% | 16.08% | +18.04% |
Dividends
CDNS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
Neither CDNS nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CDNS and GLD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDNS has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to GLD (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDNS dropped -93.13% vs GLD's -45.56%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDNS and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer