CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CDLB.TO (CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series) and XAGH.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - CDLB.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by CI Global Asset Management, while XAGH.TO is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (CAD-Hedged). CDLB.TO is actively managed, while XAGH.TO is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CDLB.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XAGH.TO.

Performance

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CDLB.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -0.85%
• 1Y: 2.23%
• 3Y*: 2.97%
• 5Y*: -0.65%
• 10Y*: —

XAGH.TO

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CDLB.TO CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series	-0.85%
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CDLB.TO and XAGH.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026	0.27

Return for Risk

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDLB.TO

CDLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 26
CDLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
CDLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CDLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CDLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
CDLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 23

XAGH.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series (CDLB.TO) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDLB.TO	XAGH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	—	—

Drawdowns

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDLB.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, which is greater than XAGH.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDLB.TO and XAGH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDLB.TO	XAGH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.06%	-3.18%	-13.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.26%	-1.48%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.58%	-1.36%	-5.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CDLB.TO	XAGH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	5.03%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.36%	5.03%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.93%	5.03%	-0.10%

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDLB.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGH.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDLB.TO vs. XAGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

CDLB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than XAGH.TO's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CDLB.TO CI DoubleLine Total Return Bond US$ Fund ETF C$ Hedged Series	4.30%	4.45%	4.35%	3.60%	2.81%	2.38%	1.14%
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDLB.TO and XAGH.TO in my portfolio?

CDLB.TO and XAGH.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CDLB.TO or XAGH.TO?

On fees, XAGH.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDLB.TO or XAGH.TO?

XAGH.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CDLB.TO.

What is the main difference between CDLB.TO and XAGH.TO?

CDLB.TO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while XAGH.TO is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CDLB.TO and 0.18% for XAGH.TO.