PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. INCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than INCE's 13.04% return.


CDL

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.31%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
10.83%

INCE

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
10.43%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and INCE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.72

The correlation between CDL and INCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDL vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
INCE

Utilities

24.3%
6.4%

Financial Services

23.4%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
9.3%

Energy

9.5%
8.1%

Technology

6.9%
7.6%

Healthcare

6.8%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
2.2%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.6%

Industrials

2.3%
9.8%

Basic Materials

0.0%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

CDL
24.3%
INCE
6.4%

Financial Services

CDL
23.4%
INCE
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.9%
INCE
9.3%

Energy

CDL
9.5%
INCE
8.1%

Technology

CDL
6.9%
INCE
7.6%

Healthcare

CDL
6.8%
INCE
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
6.6%
INCE
2.2%

Communication Services

CDL
4.4%
INCE
2.6%

Industrials

CDL
2.3%
INCE
9.8%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
INCE
4.5%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
INCE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CDLINCEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

3.26

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

4.73

-1.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.61

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

5.52

-2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.35

20.83

-9.47

CDL vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the INCE Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and INCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDLINCEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

3.26

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.84

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.84

-0.19

Drawdowns

CDL vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than INCE's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and INCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLINCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-33.95%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-4.90%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-14.01%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-18.40%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.76%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-3.25%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.30%

+0.29%

Volatility

CDL vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.02%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLINCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.02%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

5.96%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

8.32%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

13.27%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.69%

+1.35%

CDL vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than INCE's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.17%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and INCE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDL has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to INCE (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs INCE's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, INCE leads with 11.11% vs 8.68% for CDL. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, INCE has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.17% for CDL.

CDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.29% for INCE.

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and INCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer