PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has underperformed DLN with an annualized return of 11.31%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.86% annualized return.


CDL

1D
1.03%
1M
0.80%
YTD
13.80%
6M
13.70%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
11.31%

DLN

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.05%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.49%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
13.80%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
9.95%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and DLN is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.85

The correlation between CDL and DLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDL vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
DLN

Utilities

23.7%
5.5%

Financial Services

23.1%
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

15.8%
8.9%

Energy

9.0%
7.9%

Technology

8.0%
22.8%

Healthcare

6.9%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

4.4%
7.5%

Industrials

2.2%
7.8%

Basic Materials

0.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.0%
3.9%

Utilities

CDL
23.7%
DLN
5.5%

Financial Services

CDL
23.1%
DLN
17.4%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.8%
DLN
8.9%

Energy

CDL
9.0%
DLN
7.9%

Technology

CDL
8.0%
DLN
22.8%

Healthcare

CDL
6.9%
DLN
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
6.9%
DLN
4.9%

Communication Services

CDL
4.4%
DLN
7.5%

Industrials

CDL
2.2%
DLN
7.8%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
DLN
1.0%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
DLN
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDLDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.53

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

14.80

-1.72

CDL vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDL vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-57.84%

+16.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-6.10%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-13.71%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-16.26%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

-35.82%

-5.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.12%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-7.50%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.45%

+0.15%

Volatility

CDL vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.78%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

2.78%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.00%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

9.03%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

13.27%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.14%

+0.90%

CDL vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.13%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and DLN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDL has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to DLN (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, DLN leads with 12.86% vs 11.31% for CDL. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CDL.

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.79% for DLN.

CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer