PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. DEW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. DEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly lower than DEW's 19.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CDL has outperformed DEW with an annualized return of 11.17%, while DEW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.75% annualized return.


CDL

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.29%
6M
10.38%
YTD
17.17%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
11.17%
ALL TIME*
11.29%

DEW

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.29%
6M
12.79%
YTD
19.31%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
9.75%
ALL TIME*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$504.48K$625.50K$553.90K
$1.14M$632.09K$360.65K

CDL vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
17.17%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%16.29%
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
19.31%22.39%11.58%9.39%-2.73%21.29%-7.32%20.45%-10.58%15.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and DEW is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2015

0.85

The correlation between CDL and DEW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDL vs. DEW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
DEW

Utilities

24.3%
11.5%

Financial Services

24.1%
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

15.7%
8.8%

Energy

8.6%
14.5%

Healthcare

7.2%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
3.5%

Technology

6.9%
2.5%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.0%

Industrials

2.3%
5.0%

Basic Materials

0.0%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.0%
11.7%

Utilities

CDL
24.3%
DEW
11.5%

Financial Services

CDL
24.1%
DEW
25.8%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.7%
DEW
8.8%

Energy

CDL
8.6%
DEW
14.5%

Healthcare

CDL
7.2%
DEW
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
7.0%
DEW
3.5%

Technology

CDL
6.9%
DEW
2.5%

Communication Services

CDL
3.9%
DEW
4.0%

Industrials

CDL
2.3%
DEW
5.0%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
DEW
2.6%

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
DEW
11.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DEW
DEW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDL vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDLDEWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.58

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

4.77

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

19.32

-5.54

CDL vs. DEW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the DEW Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and DEW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDL vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and DEW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLDEWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-65.55%

+24.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-6.34%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-11.80%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

-18.86%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

-38.77%

-2.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-0.26%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-12.34%

+8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.56%

+0.03%

Volatility

CDL vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW) at 2.21%. This indicates that CDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLDEWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

2.21%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

7.24%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

9.55%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

12.90%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.36%

+1.68%

CDL vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than DEW's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.06%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
DEW
WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund
3.12%3.71%4.02%4.55%3.82%3.55%4.10%3.74%4.17%3.18%3.42%4.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and DEW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDL has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to DEW (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs DEW's -65.55%.

On 10-year performance, CDL leads with 11.17% vs 9.75% for DEW. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DEW has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CDL has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.

DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 3.06% for CDL.

CDL is categorized as Dividend, while DEW is Large Cap Value Equities. CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while DEW tracks WisdomTree Global High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.58% for DEW.

DEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and DEW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer