PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDL vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDL vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDL achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 42.01% return.


CDL

1D
1.78%
1M
3.68%
6M
13.91%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
11.14%

CHAT

1D
-5.30%
1M
-12.49%
6M
36.21%
YTD
42.01%
1Y
73.94%
3Y*
41.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDL vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
18.31%9.04%15.58%8.47%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
42.01%49.85%30.98%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CDL and CHAT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.09

The correlation between CDL and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CDL vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CDL
CHAT

Utilities

23.7%

-

Financial Services

23.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

15.8%

-

Energy

9.0%

-

Technology

8.0%
75.7%

Healthcare

6.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
2.6%

Communication Services

4.4%
17.9%

Industrials

2.2%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Utilities

CDL
23.7%
CHAT

-

Financial Services

CDL
23.1%
CHAT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

CDL
15.8%
CHAT

-

Energy

CDL
9.0%
CHAT

-

Technology

CDL
8.0%
CHAT
75.7%

Healthcare

CDL
6.9%
CHAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

CDL
6.9%
CHAT
2.6%

Communication Services

CDL
4.4%
CHAT
17.9%

Industrials

CDL
2.2%
CHAT
3.5%

Basic Materials

CDL
0.0%
CHAT

-

Real Estate

CDL
0.0%
CHAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDL vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDL vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDLCHATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.80

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.63

11.13

+3.51

CDL vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDL and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CDL vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDL drawdown since its inception was -41.03%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDL and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDLCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.03%

-31.34%

-9.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.66%

-19.54%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-31.34%

+18.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-19.54%

+19.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-5.52%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

6.67%

-5.07%

Volatility

CDL vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) is 4.14%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.90%. This indicates that CDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDLCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

16.90%

-12.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

32.39%

-24.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

37.11%

-26.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

31.83%

-17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

31.83%

-14.80%

CDL vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDL vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

CDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than CHAT's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.03%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
CHAT
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
2.01%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CDL and CHAT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (16.90%) compared to CDL (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDL dropped -41.03% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 41.74% vs 16.00% for CDL. On fees, CDL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 41.74% return vs 16.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 2.01% for CHAT.

CDL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CHAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CDL and 0.75% for CHAT.

CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDL and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer