CDIG vs. HERD
CDIG (City Different Investments Global Equity ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CDIG is actively managed, while HERD is passively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
CDIG vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDIG achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 15.50% return.
CDIG
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HERD
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $177.13K | $207.07K | $220.02K | |
| $186.58K | $194.07K | $183.82K |
CDIG vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CDIG City Different Investments Global Equity ETF | -0.17% | -0.39% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 15.50% | 5.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDIG and HERD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDIG vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
CDIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HERD
CDIG vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Different Investments Global Equity ETF (CDIG) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDIG | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDIG vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.35%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIG and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDIG | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -39.41% | +28.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.03% | -0.25% | -7.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -4.50% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility
CDIG vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDIG | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.96% | 11.86% | +10.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 17.68% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 20.37% | +1.59% |
CDIG vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDIG vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
CDIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDIG City Different Investments Global Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 2.71% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDIG and HERD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HERD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HERD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CDIG.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for CDIG.
They also come from different issuers: City Different and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CDIG and 0.73% for HERD.
Find the right allocation for CDIG and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer