CDIG vs. HAIL
CDIG (City Different Investments Global Equity ETF) and HAIL (SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF) are both Global Equities funds. CDIG is actively managed, while HAIL is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CDIG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HAIL.
Performance
CDIG vs. HAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CDIG achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than HAIL's 13.36% return.
CDIG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAIL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -11.36%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- -7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
CDIG vs. HAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CDIG City Different Investments Global Equity ETF | 3.08% | -0.39% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 13.36% | -2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDIG and HAIL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDIG vs. HAIL — Risk / Return Rank
CDIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAIL
CDIG vs. HAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Different Investments Global Equity ETF (CDIG) and SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDIG | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDIG vs. HAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.35%, smaller than the maximum HAIL drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIG and HAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDIG | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -65.98% | +54.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.03% | -40.20% | +35.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -31.62% | +28.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.77% | — |
Volatility
CDIG vs. HAIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDIG | HAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.72% | 30.82% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 32.17% | -9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 31.86% | -9.14% |
CDIG vs. HAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HAIL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CDIG vs. HAIL - Dividend Comparison
CDIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDIG City Different Investments Global Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAIL SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF | 1.69% | 2.00% | 2.98% | 2.62% | 2.09% | 1.36% | 0.52% | 1.17% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDIG and HAIL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CDIG.
HAIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for CDIG.
They also come from different issuers: City Different Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CDIG and 0.45% for HAIL.
Find the right allocation for CDIG and HAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer