PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CDIG vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CDIG vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in City Different Investments Global Equity ETF (CDIG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDIG achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 3.52% return.


CDIG

1D
-3.13%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
2.35%
6M
1.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
3.52%
6M
3.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDIG vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CDIG and BDVL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CDIG vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for City Different Investments Global Equity ETF (CDIG) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CDIG vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CDIGBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.81

-0.69

Drawdowns

CDIG vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDIG drawdown since its inception was -11.35%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDIG and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDIGBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-7.71%

-3.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-2.08%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-1.19%

-1.97%

Volatility

CDIG vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDIGBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.11%

9.62%

+13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.11%

9.62%

+13.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

9.62%

+13.49%

CDIG vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDIG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CDIG vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

CDIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CDIG and BDVL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CDIG.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for CDIG.

They also come from different issuers: City Different Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CDIG and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CDIG and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer