CDEI vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CDEI (Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - CDEI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index, while QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. CDEI is passively managed, while QMAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDEI returned 18.24%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for QMAR. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CDEI charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

CDEI vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 11.40% return.

CDEI

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 24.61%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CDEI vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	8.20%	16.60%	18.67%	22.82%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	11.40%	10.89%	16.11%	24.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and QMAR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.86

The correlation between CDEI and QMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CDEI vs. QMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CDEI	QMAR
Technology	44.4%	58.7%
Financial Services	14.4%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.4%	14.3%
Healthcare	9.8%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	11.4%
Industrials	4.7%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	6.4%
Utilities	2.0%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.1%
Energy	0.4%	0.5%
Basic Materials	0.3%	1.0%

Return for Risk

CDEI vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CDEI

CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 63
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 95
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CDEI vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDEI	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	3.19	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	4.77	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.74	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	6.49	-3.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	39.78	-29.04

CDEI vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and QMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, roughly equal to the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDEI	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-19.83%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.88%	-3.21%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-15.91%	-3.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-1.65%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-3.26%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	0.52%	+1.78%

Volatility

CDEI vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) at 2.92%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDEI	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	2.92%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.79%	5.59%	+4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	6.55%	+5.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	14.01%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.08%	13.83%	+1.25%

CDEI vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDEI vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	1.01%	1.05%	1.22%	1.16%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDEI and QMAR in my portfolio?

CDEI and QMAR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDEI or QMAR?

CDEI has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to QMAR (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs QMAR's -19.83%.

Which ETF is better, CDEI or QMAR?

On 3-year performance, CDEI leads with 18.24% vs 15.65% for QMAR. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, QMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDEI or QMAR?

Over the 3-year period, CDEI has performed better with a 18.24% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDEI or QMAR?

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDEI or QMAR?

CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.

What is the main difference between CDEI and QMAR?

CDEI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QMAR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.90% for QMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.