CDEI vs. ESN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CDEI (Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CDEI tracks the Russell 1000 Index while ESN tracks the Essential 40 Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CDEI returned 25.48% vs 28.79% for ESN. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CDEI charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ESN.

Performance

CDEI vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CDEI achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than ESN's 17.69% return.

CDEI

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 11.52%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 1Y: 25.48%
• 3Y*: 19.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.30%

ESN

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 12.36%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 1Y: 28.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	$670.28K	$332.00K	$158.81K
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	$2.27M	$1.62M	$1.62M

CDEI vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	12.39%	16.60%	0.19%
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	17.69%	16.52%	-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CDEI and ESN is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024	0.75

The correlation between CDEI and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CDEI vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CDEI

CDEI Risk / Return Rank: 76
CDEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
CDEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CDEI Omega Ratio Rank: 76
CDEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CDEI Martin Ratio Rank: 79

ESN

ESN Risk / Return Rank: 94
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CDEI vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CDEI	ESN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.91	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	4.00	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.51	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	4.50	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.03	18.06	-7.04

CDEI vs. ESN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CDEI Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the ESN Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CDEI and ESN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CDEI vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than ESN's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and ESN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CDEI	ESN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-13.60%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.88%	-6.42%	-3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-1.80%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.60%	+0.72%

Volatility

CDEI vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.69%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CDEI	ESN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	2.69%	+2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	7.51%	+2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.03%	9.97%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.07%	13.04%	+2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.07%	13.04%	+2.03%

CDEI vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CDEI vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ESN's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF	0.97%	1.05%	1.22%	1.16%
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	0.77%	0.91%	0.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CDEI and ESN in my portfolio?

CDEI and ESN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CDEI or ESN?

CDEI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to ESN (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs ESN's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, CDEI or ESN?

On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 28.79% vs 25.48% for CDEI. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CDEI or ESN?

Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 28.79% return vs 25.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CDEI or ESN?

CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CDEI or ESN?

CDEI has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.77% for ESN.

What is the main difference between CDEI and ESN?

CDEI tracks Russell 1000 Index, while ESN tracks Essential 40 Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and KKM. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.70% for ESN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.