CDEI vs. EQL
CDEI (Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF) and EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - CDEI tracks the Russell 1000 Index while EQL tracks the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CDEI returned 19.13%/yr vs 15.68%/yr for EQL. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CDEI charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for EQL.
Performance
CDEI vs. EQL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CDEI having a 12.39% return and EQL slightly lower at 11.79%.
CDEI
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.30%
EQL
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $670.28K | $332.00K | $158.81K | |
| $3.24M | $2.89M | $2.73M |
CDEI vs. EQL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF | 12.39% | 16.60% | 18.67% | 22.82% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 11.79% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CDEI and EQL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CDEI and EQL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
CDEI vs. EQL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CDEI
EQL
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
CDEI
EQL
Financial Services
CDEI
EQL
Healthcare
CDEI
EQL
Communication Services
CDEI
EQL
Industrials
CDEI
EQL
Consumer Defensive
CDEI
EQL
Consumer Cyclical
CDEI
EQL
Real Estate
CDEI
EQL
Utilities
CDEI
EQL
Energy
CDEI
EQL
Basic Materials
CDEI
EQL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CDEI vs. EQL — Risk / Return Rank
CDEI
EQL
CDEI vs. EQL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CDEI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 3.16 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.03 | 12.39 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CDEI vs. EQL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CDEI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum EQL drawdown of -35.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CDEI and EQL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CDEI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.46% | -35.65% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -6.19% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.46% | -15.07% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -3.23% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.58% | +0.74% |
Volatility
CDEI vs. EQL - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) at 2.29%. This indicates that CDEI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CDEI | EQL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 2.29% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 7.09% | +3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 9.47% | +3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 14.52% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.07% | 16.49% | -1.42% |
CDEI vs. EQL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CDEI has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EQL's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CDEI vs. EQL - Dividend Comparison
CDEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than EQL's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDEI Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity And Inclusion Index ETF | 0.97% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF | 1.34% | 1.73% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 2.29% | 1.95% | 2.39% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CDEI and EQL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CDEI has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to EQL (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CDEI dropped -19.46% vs EQL's -35.65%.
On 3-year performance, CDEI leads with 19.13% vs 15.68% for EQL. On fees, CDEI is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CDEI has performed better with a 19.13% return vs 15.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CDEI is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.
EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.97% for CDEI.
CDEI tracks Russell 1000 Index, while EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CDEI and 0.27% for EQL.
EQL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CDEI and EQL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer